Skip to main content

Earthly Needs

Temporary Exhibition: “Earthly Needs” December 10, 2016 through March 10, 2017

Exhibition Abstract

In viewing art presented that spans throughout the last two centuries, we can see that not only has appreciation and preservation of our Earth been a consistent artistic theme, but that the face of our planet is changing. Our needs are changing and demand is ever increasing but the resources available have not changed.

We tend to think of Environmental concerns as a relatively new issue, and emerging artists in current times frequently pursue their projects with a nod to conservation and appreciation for the environment. We strive to create art whose purpose is one of education to the vitality in our connection and respect for Earth's beauty and our inter-dependence on the planet.

However, when reviewing art over a many-generational time span, we can see that artists around the world have been devoted to capturing and sharing the beauty of the natural around us and showing us the effects mankind has had on the face of our planet.

By showcasing the works of seven different global artists across a nearly 200 year time span, with drastically different styles and mediums, viewers will be able to better understand how the environment and our connection to it has been a concern for many generations of Americans.







Featured Pieces


Thomas Cole
View Near the Village of Catskill-1827
Oil on wood 24 1⁄2 x 35 in. Loaned from the Fine Arts Museum of San Francisco, gift of Mr. and Mrs. John D. Rockefeller III in 1993.



Seneca Ray Stoddard
Lake George among the Islands-1880
Albumen Print, Photograph Approx. 6 1⁄2 x 8 1⁄2 in. Loaned by permanent collection at the Chapman Historical Museum.

Andrew Goldsworthy
Woodpigeon wing feathers / partly buried / laid around hole, Leeds, Yorkshire -August 1977
1 cibachrome photograph, 24.2 x 16.2 (9 1/2 x 16 3/8). Loaned by special collection at the University of Glasgow.

Edward Burtynsky
Phosphor Tailings Pond #1, Polk County, Florida, USA-Date Unlisted
Chromogenic Print, Photograph 60” x 80” Loaned by the Flowers Gallery of London.



Nils-Udo
Eruption d'ete~Summer Eruption-2010
Video Clip-the making of the ephemeral construct and photographing it. Used with permission of the Nicolas Feuillatte Champagne company.

Mark di Suvero
Paula's Pleasure-2011
Steel Sculpture, approx. 20 feet tall. Loaned from the collection of the Paula Cooper Gallery, New York.



Patrick Dougherty
What the Birds Know-2015
Woven Sapling Structure 22' x 8-12” diameter. Commissioned and loaned by by the Peabody Essex Museum for placement in Salem, MA at the Crowninshield- Bentley House.






Curatorial Essay on “Earthly Needs”

In viewing art presented that spans throughout the last two centuries, we can see that not only has appreciation and preservation of our Earth been a consistent artistic theme, but that the face of our planet is changing. Our needs are changing and demand is ever increasing but the resources available have not changed.

What is our responsibility, locally and globally? Can we create and build and use resources in a way that both meet our needs and preserve our finite resources? Can we be purposefully inventive, resourceful, and think outside the box to create an even richer way of life than we're already leading?

We tend to think of Environmental concerns as a relatively new issue, and emerging artists in current times frequently pursue their projects with a nod to conservation and appreciation for the environment. We strive to create art whose purpose is one of education to the vitality in our connection and respect for Earth's beauty and our inter-dependence on the planet.

However, when reviewing art over a many-generational time span, we can see that artists around the world have been devoted to capturing and sharing the beauty of the natural around us and showing us the effects mankind has had on the face of our planet. Artists have used a focus on nature to inspire spirituality, tourism, conservation, camaraderie, to issue a warning to mankind, both past and present, and many other personal motivations and endeavors. 

The categories of “Eco-art,” Earth-art, Environmental Art, and other such names often encompass a vast and diverse set of styles and subject matter, as well as intention. For some, art whose subject matter consists of something “natural,” i.e. water, or trees and such, is considered earth art. For others, a piece must somehow incorporate a direct benefit to the environment, such as rebuilding an underwater barrier reef or designing a filtration system that is visually sculptural but whose real purpose is to promote the transformation of polluted water into clean.

There are many artists whose work is touted as Eco-focused but when breaking down the process from start to finish of materials used, the short and long impacts of the creation or building process on the geographical location (major machinery and vehicles used, mass tourism that travels to the specific location to view the project, etc.) one could easily see the impact may well be more eco-damaging and irresponsible of the artist than constructive to the cause of environmental responsibility and awareness.

While there are potentially dozens of interpretations as to what constitutes Eco-art and even what to call this category of art, the one that this show will be focusing on is artists who give preference to using materials in an environmentally conscientious manner to create projects of visual or sensory interest and/or create their art in such a way as to have absolutely no direct negative impact on the planet.

Eco-art is different than other types of art because of the focus on using existing items rather than destroying or expending new resources and materials. New trees don't need to be cut down to create canvas frames or build furniture at anywhere near the same rate if existing products can be re-purposed to create these items in a fresh way. Chemicals to refine or process new material, like dyes and fabrics, are often damaging to the environment and their use can be limited. Each small step of eliminating special manufacturing processes or materials helps cut down on negative consumer impact to the Earth and our ecosystem. Small steps have large impact.

Eco-art is similar to other types of art because it seeks to enlighten and stimulate an emotional response in the viewer. Whether the goal of an artist is to excite, horrify, educate, or incite warm fuzzy feelings, environmentally responsible art functions no different than “regular” art in these respects.

By showcasing the works of seven different global artists across a nearly 200 year time span who had major commercial and artistic success, and yet still operated and created their works with very small or non-existent negative environmental impact, we can start to understand how art and our own actions can dramatically effect the environment. In addition, seeing how our connection to the environment and inter-dependence on it is not a new concept, and indeed, the preservation of the environment has been a concern for many generations of people around the globe.

Our first artist, Thomas Cole, born in England 1801-1848, focused much of his work in New York State, and even in his short lifetime, founded the Hudson River School, an artist's collaboration and style whereby the landscape of New York in the early to mid 1800's is featured as wild, ethereal, and fraught with spiritual meaning and intentions. By portraying man as a small being interacting within the vast landscape or simply overlooking within the environment instead of conquering it, he created a sense of adventurous abandon and re-connecting to the Divine for the viewer.

His landscape paintings utilize ethereal scenes free from the sense of industry or man's influence, and many of his works do not include even a remote sign of humans or their touch. Cole's paintings used vivid colors and and a unique balance between fine details and a kind of overall hazy glow to draw the viewer into the fantasy of overlooking a glimpse of biblical Eden from the eyes of Adam or Eve.

The takeaway messages can be both that the land is most perfect without man's involvement, and even when man is present, the land is still the more important between the two entities shown.

The black and white photography of American Seneca Ray Stoddard, 1844-1917, in the late 1800's around New York State is considered not only an essential contribution to the tourism and financial boom of Lake George and surrounding areas, but also credited with the education of state and federal lawmakers towards instituting the protected lands of the great Adirondack Park. Stoddard was not only a photographer but a political advocate of land conservation and the prevention of complete annihilation by logging companies and developers in the 1800's throughout the region.

Stoddard's work also features the serene landscapes of upstate New York, in both grand scale and intimate settings. We're able to see mountain ranges with harsher edges and jagged peaks in his photographs that are actually quite varied from the now-rounded ranges our eye sees over one hundred and fifty years later. We can see clear photographic evidence of environmental change from then to now if we study the images.

Most of Scotland native Andy Goldsworthy's works are initially quite subtle. Goldsworthy, born 1956, states that his goal with each piece is that while it uses nature, and is set in nature, it is clearly manmade. He doesn't want his work to be mistaken as being produced by nature. Generally, the image of each project requires several moments of contemplation, as the viewer first identifies what they're looking at, then begins to wonder how the piece was accomplished and what materials were used and how they were made to look like they look. The size of each piece varies, and proportions of the construct is further played with via the presented photographic image.

Goldsworthy uses all found, earth-made ingredients for his work. Flowers, whole or the parts, icicles, leaves, mud, pine cones, snow, stone, twigs, thorns, clay, bark, and the like. For his ephemeral works, he uses no man-made tools, only what he can provide physically and what he can find on site. He proves over and over that a little ingenuity goes a long way. To create a star shape from icicles, he affixed the icicles together using his own saliva...once it froze, the star was balanced on a couple tips and photographed. Once the spring thaw came, there would be nothing left to prove or suggest the manipulations of an artist's hand.

There doesn't seem to be any direct negative environmental impact whatsoever with his work. All materials used are found naturally and used without toxic or harmful alteration. His creations brings awareness of the great diversity and opportunity found within nature and that unique beauty that can be made without negative impact.

Through the large scale, aerial photographs of Edward Burtynsky, born 1955 in Ontario, an internationally acclaimed photographer and environmental documentarian from the late 1900's through current, we are able to view the enormous impact of man on the environment and the global impact of industry.

By focusing on patterns, texture, and colors, we initially see the images as abstract paintings. Only by further examination, we can see what each image is truly depicting. Around the world we see mass battlefields of abandoned cars or tires. We see river deltas and the seemingly endless piles of polluted silt that has amassed from factories upstream. We see vast canyons gouged into the earth's crust by machines of progress. We see that whether the image comes from a place 20 miles from our home or 2,000 miles away, man is having a dramatic impact on the way our world looks. Burtynsky's images are both amazing and heartbreaking as we realize the colors and patterns are a sort of savage beauty wrought by ignorant or careless intention.

Nils-Udo, born 1937 in Bavaria, is an ephemeral constructer and photographer who creates work that has the feel of being completed by fairies or other mysterious woodland creatures. It's quite lighthearted and enjoyable, whimsical, even. Its simplicity is deceptive as it takes a great deal of creative power to take random objects found in nature and not only display them in a fashion that indicates a mood, or a feeling, but to do so in a way that cannot harm the environment or leave any lasting negative effect.

His work featured here was created as an ad campaign for a French champagne called Nicolas Feuillatte. The final result is very soft and floaty in feel, appropriate for the lightness and bubbles of Champagne. Taking no shortcuts that would involve the use of chemical adhesives, he takes the time and expends the effort to make mud and use that as glue, and to weave grasses as rope or twine. His pieces draw attention to the beauty and possibility of nature and the options we have to create truly environmentally conscientious and respectful work.

Combining straight lines with spiral or circular shapes, international artist Mark di Suvero, born in China to Italian parents in 1933, and then emigrating to America before reaching his teenage years, employs a peculiar geometric mash-up that most closely resemble playground structures and industrial construction or farming equipment of some sort. They're both playful and imposing, and constructed of commercial grade steel or wood. 

The pieces are designed to be interactive-capable, either in passive or deliberate ways such as the use of a swing and or even a musical instrument-“Chimes” was designed to allow the wind to create a sound as it moves across the piece, thereby forcing an interaction with nature that wouldn't otherwise exist but not actually negatively affecting the environment in any way. It always reflects a unique representation of the changing world around it but the sculpture itself is never altered.

By using negative space to frame and define the natural elements around the sculpture, such as the sky, or a view of the water, a sculpture will often become more than just the physical lines of the piece. Even when brought indoors, di Suvero's sculptures still take on a unique interaction with their surroundings and in the case of the swing, invite us to sit and contemplate. With his use of commercially-intended industrial materials being transformed into art, the artist asks us to consider what we value more and what contributes to our well-being-another skyscraper or a unique place to read, climb, perhaps enjoy an ice cream cone?

Patrick Dougherty, born 1945 in Oklahoma, is an international installation artist who works with local volunteers at each site to gather saplings of various species and then create massive woven structures that resemble the huts and homes of fairytale creatures. The structures are semi-permanent, and when built outdoors, generally last from 1-4 years before nature reclaims them. By clearing out over-populated new forest areas and using only indigenous species of trees, Dougherty's constructs are both non-harmful and conducive to the environment around them.

By using local help, the artist not only limits negative global impact (no specialty crews, transports, or financial impact is necessary) but increases community awareness and interaction, leaving each construct amongst new friends and collaborators. 

By exploring environmentally-focused art across multiple generations, created by artists around the globe, we can explore the past, the present, and start to think on and decide how to create our future. Showing the diversity in style and long-standing efforts of environmentally astute artists reminds us this has been and will continue to be an issue that effects us all in varying ways and no matter where or who we are, we can all contribute in positive or negative ways. The choice is ours and never more important than now.
                                          
                                          Thomas Cole~ View Near the Village of Catskill, 1827


                                          Seneca Ray Stoddard~ Lake George among the Islands, 1880



                                          Andrew Goldsworthy~ Woodpigeon Wing Feathers-1977



                                          Edward Burtynsky~Phosphor Tailings, Pond #1, Polk County, Florida,          

                                          USA-date unlisted


 Summer Eruption by Nils-Udo, 2010   Please click link to be directed to the Video Display


                                          Mark di Suvero-Paula's Pleasure-2011

                                                    Patrick Dougherty-What the Birds Know-2015










Resources Referenced


Andy Goldsworthy Exhibition History: 1977-1986. (n.d.). Retrieved December 10, 2016, from http://www.goldsworthy.cc.gla.ac.uk/image/?id=ag_00546&t=1
"Edward Burtynsky - Biography." Edward Burtynsky - Biography. Accessed November 12, 2016. http://edwardburtynsky.com/site_contents/About/aboutBio.html.
"Edward Burtynsky's Corrupted Landscapes – in Pictures." The Guardian. 2016. Accessed November 12, 2016.
"Explore Thomas Cole." Explore Thomas Cole. 2010. Accessed November 13, 2016. http://www.explorethomascole.org/.
Kors, Stacey. "Sculpture in Salem Really Sticks out - The Boston Globe." Www.bostonglobe.com. May 23, 2015. Accessed November 12, 2016.
Mark di Suvero. (n.d.). Retrieved December 10, 2016, from https://www.paulacoopergallery.com/exhibitions/mark-di-suvero-2011-11-22/press-release
"Seneca Ray Stoddard Collection." Remembering the History of Glens Falls, Queensbury and the Southern Adirondacks : Chapman Historical Museum. Accessed November 12, 2016.
"Splash." Patrick Dougherty. Accessed November 12, 2016. http://stickwork.net/.
"Stoddard, Seneca Ray Group Lot-Photographs." Www.invaluable.com. May 26, 2005. Accessed November 12, 2016.
Summer Eruption by Nils-Udo [Video file]. (2010). France: Champagne Nicolas Feuillatte. Retrieved December 10, 2016, from https://youtu.be/gm9OyixUgC0


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Nampa Street Art

Rebecca L. Fisk Nampa Street Art – A Brief Overview “ Open Invitation” by Idaho-native Lauren Kistner is one of the many art-wrapped utility boxes sponsored by the cities of Nampa and Boise as part of their “art in public” initiatives. The original painting is watercolor paint and ink mixed media. The designs for these traffic utility signal wraps were professionally printed and wrapped on a sticky plastic material and applied to the boxes similarly to a graphics car wrap. Kistner's work from this series is based on the geothermal activity and other natural phenomenon that occurs throughout the state of Idaho. I love the texture and combinations of techniques and colors she uses. They truly emulate the landscape in Yellowstone, the deserts around Boise, and the mountains and waterways throughout the state. Known simply as “The Horse Mural,” according to Nampa's City website and “Galloping Horses” according to “Waymarking”,...

Historical Military Fortifications

Introduction The need for a military fortification was not found until mankind began establishing permanent or semi-permanent long-term residences and communities. The desire to protect one's assets is universal and the desire to pursue another's assets and claim them for your own has been well documented in the countless fortifications that have been built around the globe for the past ten thousand years. I've explored just a few and presented varying examples from different cultures and time periods. Sargon's Fortress~720 B.C.E. The lands of Mesopotamia were fraught with on-going conflicts from as far back as historical references account for. “Repeatedly during its long history, hostile groups invaded from the north and east, producing periodic dramatic political changes” (Roth, 2007).  From 4000 B.C.E. To 224 C.E., roughly four thousand plus years, this region saw some of the fiercest battles over the prized land as any time in his...